Posts Tagged ‘biotech’

During the Fringe break, we break for chocolate

Wednesday, October 28th, 2009

After a long week tweeting from the floor of the FFA National AgriScience Fair, we’re happy to report we’re taking a break this week. More specifically, we get the chance to talk about one of my favorite topics, chocolate.

Apparently today is (one of many) National Chocolate Day, not that there’s any reason not to choc-talk at other points in the year. The point here being, it reminds me of an article I saw a while back, pleading with biotech scientists to come up with a solution to falling cocoa harvests. As of only a few years ago, 20% of the world’s cocoa beans were being lost to disease – with a looming threat of spreading crop diseases. This clearly affects the availability and price of chocolate, not to mention the viability of the crop for farmers.

We checked around and couldn’t find any mention on biotech companies working on developing a stronger cocoa harvest. So we turn it over to you.  Does anyone know about work being done on this front?  We’d love to hear about it.  If not, maybe one of the great FFA’ers we had the chance to meet last week will come up with the solution.

Bruckheimer Strikes Back

Tuesday, October 20th, 2009

Although Fringe is being supplanted by the nation’s favorite past time this week, we received quite a few emails from folks who saw last night’s episode of CSI: Miami – “Bad Seed”. After watching the episode online, I have to say it was utterly shocking. And really, for a number of reasons… so let’s start with the most obvious ones.

We spent last year defending science from the constant onslaughts of Jerry Bruckheimer’s CBS series, Eleventh Hour (hence the name of Eleventh Hour Facts). We sat through all the episodes, no matter how ridiculous the “science” that he employed in the plotline. So you can imagine our surprise when “Bad Seed” turned out to be a recycled episode of Eleventh Hour called “Agro” – even with some of the actors who appeared in Eleventh Hour! Lazy? Probably… but what is worrying is that Jerry Bruckheimer clearly has a bone to pick with biotech crops, without ever even considering the actual facts about the wonder that is modern agriculture.

Bruckheimer’s premise in “Bad Seed” is that crazy mad scientists in a corporate lab mixed botulism DNA in with corn DNA willy-nilly, and it is now out killing everyone who eats a certain strain of corn. As we’ve seen so many times with Jerry, this makes for fascinating fiction, with little science attached. There was even mention of there not being any real federal regulation of these biotech products. This is not only a flat-out lie, but flies in the face of so many researchers who have worked so hard to feed our growing global population. So, here is what actually happens when it comes to the approval of biotech crops.

Every biotech crop endures years and years of safety approval processes before it’s released into the market for human or animal consumption…

For one, the USDA examines data regarding the agricultural and environmental safety of the crop. They also want to see data that show this new crop is no more likely to succumb to disease or insect attack than a comparable non-biotech variety. The agency also needs data to demonstrate that the crop will not adversely affect threatened and endangered species or harm their habitat.

In yet another corner of DC, the FDA holds a voluntary consultation process (with which everyone complies) where they examine the nutritional equivalency of the new crop (and food made from it) with a non-biotech counterpart. The FDA is specifically interested in gross changes in the levels of nutrients, increases in allergens and toxic substances, and increases in anti-nutritive substances (chemicals that make key nutrients less absorbable).

And lastly, the EPA looks at crops that produce pesticidal substances. So they need data regarding the environmental safety of the substance, its persistence in the environment, its effects on non-target organisms (Monarch butterflies, for example), and the level of the pesticide residue in the crop at harvest.

And in one final moment of dubious scientific merit for Bruckheimer, there was a flaccid attempt at torpedoing biotechnology in general by raising the scaaary specter of what they call “cell conjugation”. Now… what would happen in the real world is that a scientist would move a bacterial gene with a desired function (like enhanced digestibility) into corn. The process of genetic engineering has been sufficiently refined so that a single gene (or a single DNA piece) is moved, and there is no way that the ability to “conjugate” would be moved along with the gene. While larger pieces of DNA could be moved in an experiment setting, this would never take place in a crop intended for commercial use. Plus, where are these “surrounding traits” that the corn absorbed? It’s not as if only these two traits would have moved and nothing else. Patently absurd.

Once again, in the interest of entertainment, Bruckheimer has led prime-time TV audiences (TWICE!) to wonder about the safety of their food. It’s important that TV audiences be able to separate fact from fiction, understand how America is able to provide the safest and most affordable food supply on the planet, and learn how biotechnology is helping to bring such food prosperity to developing nations.

Quick recap of yesterday’s Fringe: The Exploden’ing

Friday, October 2nd, 2009

Wow… so last night, we learned that harmonic resonance can blow people up. Sorta. We’re going to dig around for some more information on sonic resonance (contact us if you’re an expert!), and see if we can’t get you some real answers on that soon. In the meantime, here’s our weekly video showing us what we learned on Fringe last night. mmm… coffee…

Join us here Thursday at 9pm to live blog Fringe

Wednesday, September 30th, 2009

We’ve seen that this week’s episode has something to do with turning folks into explosive gel. Sounds intriguing. Join us at 9pm EST here as we live blog the third episode of this season’s Fringe with NCRM’s Michael Gilkey.

Biotech cotton kills Indian farmers

Tuesday, September 22nd, 2009

There has been a lot of misinformation thrown around the net on this topic.  In short, anti-science campaigners claim that farmers growing biotech cotton in India found their crops were failing, leading to an unsustainable amount of debt for the farmers, prompting a spike in local suicide rates.

While these suicides are tragic, this claim is one of the most widely distributed myths online today. Let’s take a look at the facts.

India’s cotton productivity was one of the lowest in the world mainly due to native pests. Despite widespread use of pesticides, farmers were unable to control the bollworm that sometimes ravaged up to 80% of the crop. Since the introduction of biotech cotton hybrids for commercial cultivation in March 2002, India has become the world’s third largest producer and exporter (after China and the United States) in just a few years and scientists attribute this to higher yields from biotech cotton. Last year, India produced 29 million bales, exporting more than five million of these. Production in India has risen from 13.6 million bales to 24 million bales within two years rising to a record 31.5 million in 2007-08. Once biotech cotton was introduced, exports rose above one million bales to reach a peak of 8.5 million in 2007-08. In fact, biotech cotton farmers in India are experiencing their best economic benefits ever.

Furthermore, in October 2008, the International Food Policy Research Institute released a study called “Bt Cotton and Farmer Suicide in India” which shows no increase in farmer suicides in India due to biotech cotton. The IFPRI study provides a real analysis of all the key factors with a prominent role in Indian debt such as: a lack of formal budget management training; no formal credit institutions; loan interest rates of 20-30%; no debt relief laws for farmers; the unwitting purchase of imitation biotech seed from sham artists; crop failures due to poor weather; lack of an irrigation systems; lack of alternative sources of income outside of agriculture; and personal debts such as endowment obligations for the marriage of daughters and/or family medical bills.

Yet another independent research study – this one completed by the National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganized Sector (NCEUS) in December 2008 – concluded “Increased Indebtedness Leads to Farmer Suicide.”

In short, Indian farmers are attaining better yields, earning bigger returns on their investment and using less pesticide – which ultimately allows them to afford a much better quality of life for their families.

Sneak peek at Thursday – and a notable passing

Monday, September 14th, 2009

This Thursday, Fringe picks up again and it looks like the show’s writers have frontloaded this season with a lot of plot-changing developments. According to some early reports, one character might die, another (probably Dunham) ends up in the hospital, and there are even reports of a small-screen kiss. For many of us, we’ve been watching Dunham and Bishop grow closer over time… so maybe something finally happens on that front?

Join us on Thursday at 9pm EST for our live-blogging of the science behind Fringe. We may be watching alternative universes on this season’s premiere, but in this universe, we’ll be waiting for you to join us at the time above.

On a much sadder note, one of the most important men of the 20th Century, Dr. Norman Borlaug, died over the weekend. We would like to extend our heartfelt condolences to the family of the man who fed over a billion people. Dr. Borlaug was a pioneer in the field of biotechnology, and developed wheat and rice strains with much-improved yields that are still in use today. If you would like to leave your own condolences, we encourage you to join the biotech community in saying good-bye here.

Biotech crops are bad for the planet

Saturday, September 12th, 2009

FALSE.

In fact, biotechnology has helped us re-examine agriculture, looking at ways to improve yield while cutting down on the environmental impact of any farm. Biotech crops’ water-saving and fuel-saving benefits are already well-documented, but these crops also address one of modern agriculture’s most concerning issues – pesticides.

Many pest-sensitive species of plants need some sort of protection in order to produce a profitable crop yield, but consumers are often wary of the amount of pesticides being sprayed on their food. This is where biotechnology steps in, by configuring the genes of a plant to resist the pests themselves – without all the extra spraying. One agricultural economist (Graham Brookes) recently even went so far as to say that after 11 years of widespread use, biotech crops had done more to help protect the environment than any other single technology. In 2006, for example, the use of biotech crops saved 14.8 million kg of carbon emissions through less pesticide use and fewer field passes. That is equivalent to taking 6.6 million cars off the roads for one year. Pest-resistant biotech crops have also reduced global pesticide applications by 630 million pounds.

Just one example lies in the case of the humble eggplant. This is a staple food in India, where much of the farming is done at a local level by cash-strapped farmers – typical for the 90% of resource-poor farmers in the developing world that grow biotech crops. Due to a local pest, eggplants often come to market spotty and half-eaten… with a precious few farmers using the massive amount of pesticides needed to protect the eggplant fruit. In a cooperative effort with Monsanto, India is testing a whole new crop that would require 30% less pesticides – cutting down on the eggplant’s environmental impact and reducing costs for local farmers.

Welcome to the NEW EleventhHourFacts.com!

Thursday, September 10th, 2009

So, yes, it’s been a while since we last posted for Eleventh Hour… why?  Well, it’s been cancelled. But when we heard from you just how much you enjoyed the live blogging – in addition to all the hits on our expert films and podcasts – we decided to think bigger…

We decided to follow your suggestions and pick up on shows other than Eleventh Hour that have dubious science involved.  And so we start this network season by following Fringe every week starting with next week’s premiere.

That’s not all, either. We’re also asking you to keep your eyes out for interesting pop culture to cover. Did you see a movie with some dubious science? Or how about a tv show that needs to beef up its writers’ understanding of what DNA is?  Either way, let us know … or become a contributor!  Just click on the ‘contact’ link in the sidebar to the right.

We’re also on twitter and facebook, so please make sure to say ‘hi’, join our group, and let us know what you think. You can also keep track of the newest changes (and there will be changes) by signing up for our email updates in the box to the right. So, once again, please join us on the evening of September 17th, when we’ll be joined once again by NCRM’s Michael Gilkey for a live blogging session of the season premiere.  See you then!

EleventhHourFacts.com Returns!

Wednesday, September 9th, 2009

And with the return, come new regular mashups. Let us know what you think in the comments below!

Moving houses

Saturday, August 22nd, 2009

Hey everyone. Thanks again for your many MANY great reviews, tips and questions – whether on twitter or email. We’ve fielded well over a hundred questions, and managed to slip in some of your reviews around the site.

Soon, though, we’ll be moving this site over to a new-and-improved EleventhHourFacts.com. If you haven’t had a chance yet to check it out, please do. We started following CBS’ hit show Eleventh Hour last year, shining a light on the truth behind the science fiction. That was the inspiration for District9Facts, and it will be our continuing model as we move forward – light-heartedly examining some of the more dubious bits of science in today’s pop culture shows.

So join us as the summer draws to a close and the new fall programming begins. Please contact us if you’d like to help us review the science in these shows come autumn, or even if you have a specific show you’d like to suggest we follow. See you again soon!

The opinions and contents of this page do not reflect those of the Biotechnology Industry Organization

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy