Thanks to our tweeple for alerting us to the fact that tonight’s episode of Fringe is an out-of-sequence/never-aired episode from Season 1. While we will be including it in our videos and probably even write it up a bit, we won’t be launching the usual accompanying live blog. Apparently, Fringe will soon return to its Thursday timeslot, and we’ll be back here as well live blogging it with you. Stay tuned for more.
Archive for the ‘Archive’ Category
Craziness with Fringe’s timeslot
Monday, January 11th, 2010Calling all miracle workers – win $10,000 for your favorite charity!
Thursday, January 7th, 2010We’ve mentioned the movie Extraordinary Measures here previously… and we continue to look forward to seeing it in a few weeks’ time. However, the movie studio is running a campaign for people with inspiring stories (patients, scientists, patient advocates) to submit a video and build an inspiration video quilt of sorts. The winning video will receive $10,000 to direct to their favorite charity… and given how many science folks we have out there as readers, we hope you’ll let people know about all the interesting research and good work you do. Once you have submitted your video for the quilt, email it to us at yourstory@iambiotech.org so we can include it on our sister site IAmBiotech.org.
Just as a bit of background, the movie has a great tagline: Don’t hope for a miracle – Make one. The reason for the tagline (and the quilt for that matter) is because the movie centers around the struggle of a father (John Crowley) who is desperate to save his children from the very rare Pompe Disease. Crowley pleads for a biotech scientist to help him find a breakthrough cure before they die. Despite overwhelming odds, well… you’ll have to see the movie for the rest. But I can almost guarantee for those scientists and healthcare workers who work to heal our friends and neighbors on a daily basis, this will truly hit home.
Fringe changes timeslots
Thursday, January 7th, 2010We wanted to put a quick note up to folks that (at some point over the past few days) the network has decided to move Fringe around a bit. We’ll be back here live blogging with you now on MONDAYS at 9pm EST, instead of our regular Thursday dates. Join us then!
Getting caught up on Fringe
Wednesday, January 6th, 2010So after a looooong holiday season, we’re back to mine Fringe for its science’y goodness. And just to catch you up, here’s a few reminders of where we left off a month or so ago…
Quick cures
Tuesday, January 5th, 2010I often hear people say things like “we need more government research in X disease”. It’s times like this I want to bury my face in my hands or bang it on a wall a couple of times, because statements like this display a certain naivete which – while cute – isn’t particularly helpful in getting the job done. It’s just not how things work. Of course the government can have a significant role to play in advancing disease-specific research, but the greatest leaps forward are usually through a public-private partnership. So, I thought… why not provide a relatively short summary of just what goes into researching a cure… especially with the movie Extraordinary Measures coming out in only a few weeks? After all, this film deals with a desperate dad trying to save his children’s lives, and is not an uncommon story within the biotechnology community at all.
Step one – Fund research: This is likely the step that most people are thinking of when they say “we need more government research”. The National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) 50,000 competitive grants support more than 325,000 researchers at over 3,000 universities medical schools and research institutions across the United States. Without progressive increases in NIH funding, the number of researchers will inevitably decrease as the funding dries up. But that is only the first step.
Step two – Protect patents: Each biologic drug (for example) takes approximately $1.2 billion and 12-15 years in development before it reaches the approval stage. Without strong patent protection, there is little incentive for private research institutions to spur innovation and breakthrough treatments.
Step three – Invest in start-ups: Of all the FDA-approved biotech therapies on the market through 2005, about one-third were from companies receiving SBIR funding (aka: small businesses or start-ups). Counterproductive tax policies and limiting SBIR funding to research start-ups like these can literally rip the rug out from under promising therapies.
Step four – Strengthen the FDA: The FDA regulates products worth nearly $1.5 trillion annually, but total FDA appropriations don’t even cover operating costs. By fully funding the FDA, the agency will be able to manage (in a timely fashion) the growing volume of breakthrough therapies that have to be fully vetted before going to market… otherwise, it will act as an unnecessary bottleneck in getting desperately needed treatments to people.
Step five – Fair pricing: More than 400 biotech drugs are in clinical trials for 200+ diseases such as Alzheimer’s, heart disease, diabetes, AIDS and many others. Government-imposed pricing mandates can eviscerate the necessary early-stage investment, leaving desperate patients with nowhere to turn.
Step six – Assure safety: Patients must be helped to understand that there are risks as well as benefits to any given treatment. No treatment is 100% effective, and unrealistic expectations of a treatment’s safety will lead to lawsuits and limit access to needed medications. However, enhancing safety through high-tech post-market surveillance can enhance safety dramatically. It’s really all about having a common sense approach to medicine and accepting a certain level of personal responsibility when undergoing treatment.
All of these are crucial components to finding effective treatments, so I look forward to seeing how this will be portrayed in Extraordinary Measures. In short, finding cures is much more complicated than many people realize, and the people involved in it are taking heroic risks with their careers and sanity. A simplistic demand for “more government research” into a disease doesn’t accomplish much. Providing a competitive environment for researchers to take the necessary risks does.
What do you think? Is there anything missing from this list?
Thoughts from Pandora
Wednesday, December 23rd, 2009After digging out from underneath the Snowpocalypse this past weekend, we finally were able to make good on our promise to see Avatar. To put it mildly, we were not disappointed. The film managed to capture a truly different world, its inhabitants and its flora and fauna… flawlessly. From astounding examples of bioluminescence to the careful detail paid to Pandora’s animal life, we were blown away. (A word of advice… see it in 3-D if you can)
Now, Popular Mechanics beat us to the punch in analyzing the science behind Avatar: the exoskeletal war machines; alpha centauri; antimatter propulsion; and even the plausibility of linking one’s consciousness to a biological being. And these science experts are absolutely right on these fronts. However, we do have a few lingering questions which popped up during the movie…
Connectivity: Beyond the fact that we are nowhere near understanding how to integrate consciousness into a foreign biological body, we here take issue with the mechanics behind this amazing connection everyone is able to maintain with their respective Avatar. For example, at one point in the film, the main character is lost on Pandora in his avatar. The embedded military conducts a widespread search for him, but cannot locate him. NONE THE LESS… his connection with his avatar remains unbroken. Umm… what?! No GPS? No signal tracking? Speaking of which, how in the heck does the signal even reach through jungle and swamp all over the moon of Pandora? The energy output on a transmitter would have to be unimaginable. And how about the avatars themselves? Do their biomechanical energies (as mentioned in the movie) power the receiver? This is probably the weakest scientific point, and is never really addressed in the film.
Geology: On the moon of Pandora, we find floating mountains (the Hallelujah Mountains) and a new mineral referred to as unobtainium (yes, we think they phoned that one in too). Pandora has less gravity on it, and it orbits a massive gas giant, similar to Jupiter. But how exactly would either of these factors allow huge stone mountains to float in mid-air? If the gravity of a nearby gas giant is enough to pull mountains aloft, wouldn’t it just pull the whole kit n’ kaboodle (aka: Pandora) along with it? As for the unobtainium mineral deposits and their energy potential, we’ve decided to let James Cameron have a free pass on that, because the movie was so damn good in general. We’ll assume for now that this was just “creative license”.
Disease: We all know that nature abhors a vacuum. We also know that close contact between any two living beings will result in bacterial/viral exchange. So how is it that all of Pandora’s creatures we were introduced to, have these organic “plugs” hot-wired to their central nervous system which allow them to download or upload the consciousness of others… yet there is no worry about disease? To me, that’s tantamount to french kissing a komodo dragon on the lips and expecting you’ll be juuust fine. Are there no viruses or bacteria on Pandora? With such a diverse array of flora and fauna, one would assume that somewhere along the evolutionary tree, a virus or two evolved, no?
What do you think? Did we miss something in Avatar? Did you see something that didn’t quite meet the high bar of scientific accuracy James Cameron set for the film? We would love to hear about it. Email us, tweet us or let us know in the comments below!
Speaking up for science
Tuesday, December 15th, 2009While we on this side of the pond obsess with Tiger Woods and his multiple infidelities, a team of scientists are gathering in India to discuss how to feed our growing world. By 2050, our planet’s farms will need to feed nine billion people… effectively, we need to double world food productivity using less land and water and fewer soil nutrients. And the scientists are breaking out of their usual non-confrontational stances, speaking up for modern agricultural techniques (and the billions who rely on this technology for access to cheap foodstuffs).
For one, Cornell University Professor Ronald Herring piped in with this: “While recombinant DNA technology has been widely accepted for pharmaceutical products, despite the high risks involved, the same technology has run into opposition in its application in food crops though there is no known risk.”
That’s a pretty powerful statement. It’s even more powerful when you pair that with Biologistics International’s Shanthu Shantaram, who alleged that the campaign unleashed by the anti-GM lobby was based on misinformation, disinformation and outright falsehood. Based on some of what we’ve seen bandied around, this doesn’t come as too much of a surprise to us. After all, Jerry Bruckheimer seems like he’s already on a one-man mission to stop modern science from using biotech crops to feed our world.
What do you think? Is there an “anti-GM lobby”? Can we ascribe all the misinformation and bunk science as having been crafted by groups with dubious scientific credentials? Let us know what you think!
Upcoming films we’re watching
Tuesday, December 15th, 2009For the next 23 days, we’ll be turning our gaze away from the science of Fringe, and looking around at some other areas where science meets popular fiction.
This weekend (not last weekend – as we clearly had our dates mixed up) James Cameron’s Avatar releases, and we couldn’t be more excited. This year’s Surrogates movie really irked us with its apocalyptic view of life-changing technology that could assist the paralyzed and handicapped, but Cameron takes the same science and turns it into a life-affirming message (by all accounts). In short, a handicapped marine’s thoughts are inserted into an avatar on an alien world – and he is given full mobility back… and then some. Thankfully Cameron (unlike Mostow) gives a more positive view of the science which could potentially help our friends and neighbors in years to come.
In a similar vein, we can’t wait for Extraordinary Measures to come out next month. While it may not be our normal scifi fare here on EleventhHourFacts, we can’t wait for what looks to be a very accurate portrayal of the drug discovery process that biotech researchers endure daily. The movie is based on the true story of John Crowley – whose children both inherited Pompe Disease, which manifests itself as a life-threatening wasting away of the muscles.
In keeping with the movie’s tagline “Don’t Hope for a Miracle. Make One.”, Crowley enlisted a biotech researcher (played by Harrison Ford in the film) to help find a treatment for what is really quite a rare disease. These groups of personally committed charity investors are what is driving much of the tremendous research we see today in biotechnology’s “emerging companies”. So the film not only shows Crowley’s personal struggle, but it also highlights just how time-consuming and byzantine the road to a “cure” can actually be.
In addition, the film’s website has a load of ways for you to participate in helping to find so many treatments still undiscovered. They have an online “quilt” where you can upload your story and win $10k for your favorite charity. They have a way for you to share your inspirational story on twitter or facebook. They also have much more information on Pompe Disease and the struggle it took to find a treatment. Inspiring story of science bringing real positive change to the world we live in – and just how hard that road can be at times. Check out the trailer below, and let us know if you think you’ll want to see this movie too:
Fringe episode 10 live blog
Thursday, December 10th, 2009Join us here as we live blog this week’s Fringe (where’s walter?) at 9pm EST along with our resident science blogger Michael Gilkey from the National Center for Regenerative Medicine.
Top Sci-Fi Movies of the decade?
Wednesday, December 9th, 2009We took a look at Wired’s list of this decade’s most beloved scifi movies… and while there were some true greats in there (Stanislaw Lem’s “Solaris” for example), there were also some real stinkers (District 9, for example). Now, while each of us has his/her own personal taste in films, we evaluated the list exclusively from the perspective of the plausibility of the science involved. What do you think? Were there others that should have made the list, but didn’t? Are any of these unfairly promoted to a “best of” list? Let us know in the comments below!
-
biotech
biotechnology
blomkamp
cbs
District 9
dna
Eleventh Hour
explosive
Fringe
live blog
mole man
ncrm
research
reviews
stem cell
Twitter
There are no items in this feed.
Blogroll
- Animal Ag Alliance
- Axiom’s Edge
- Clone Info
- Coalition for the Advancement of Medical Research
- Farmer Gene Blog
- IMDb TV Blog
- io9
- National Center for Regenerative Medicine
- NOVA Science Now
- Rotten Tomatoes
- SCI FI Wire
- Science Fiction Fantasy World
- Science on TV
- Scientific American's 60-Second Science Blog
- SciFi Picks
- The Website @ The End Of The Universe
- Truth About Trade & Technology
- What Can Biotech Do For You
The opinions and contents of this page do not reflect those of the Biotechnology Industry Organization

